People Who Deny Eyewitness Testimonies
Fallacy of Negative Proof – how can you prove they did not
see what they claim?
Pick out a couple eyewitnesses of the dozens and trash them
Pick out a few quotes by an eyewitness and contradict only those
Later critical interviewers assume that previous ones were poor
Throw eyewitness testimony out like the garbage
Rebuttal or even plausible options to critical analysis are not
Only the negative critique survives unless fair and balanced
Which is easier, to be critical of someone or to conduct real
archaeological research and build up a position?
ArcImaging - The Search For Noah's Ark